If not prosecuted or challenged, the judgment obtained will not pass "Exequatur".(Enforcement). No doubt then, that ignoring European laws, rights of Email Database image and privacy amongst other can happen and can have undesired consequences. Jurisprudence has Email Database considered that services completed this ways as irregular and have engage the liability of the plaintiff. The "Lex fori forum" and "Plaintiff's Attorney" are obliged ex-lege to respect the Email Database lex-loci or the legal requirements of the jurisdiction where documents will be served and these starts at home with confidentiality.
Secrecy and a proper translation of documents as the basic right of defendant. Service of Process must protect the defendant abroad. It is my understanding that "Lex fori" process servers, Non Certified Translations Companies, even with offices in Europe and other intruders in the chain of International litigation can severely contaminate a Email Database case. There are, a series of channels in an "alternatives or decentralized method" , more reliable and with more efficient ways to serve, these are replacing the anachronistic central method.
Centralized Service of Process has the following characteristics: 1.Translation: a. High Cost b. Unnecessary c. No distinction between Individuals and Corporations 2.Service Speed: Slow and can paralize eassily 3.Prior Exam of legality a. Slows Email Database down b. Contradictory 4.Exact Address 5.Non Personal Service 6.No Courtesy 7.No Confidentiality 8..... Hague's Alternative method of International Service of Process The Alternative Email Database method is composed by channels , using them has the same legal value and effects as the "Centralized" method, if the country of "Lex Loci" has presented no express opposition to them,.there is no hierarchy between "Centralized" and "Decentralized" methods.